PRODUCTIVITY AND FINANCE: THE INTANGIBLE ASSETS CHANNEL (FROM VIETNAMESE SME DATA)

Javlonbek Nematov

doi:10.55439/EIT/vol13_iss7/727

Авторы

Javlonbek Nematov Department of Economics and Business Management, Nordic International University, Tashkent (Uzbekistan) https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4811-959X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55439/EIT/vol13_iss7/727

Ключевые слова:

TFP(total factor productivity), tangible/intangible assets, investment, SME (small and medium-sized enterprises), FDI (foreign direct investment)

Аннотация

In this research, an author investigated what factors might increase firms` overall (total factor productivity) TFP productivity. There are some firms` intangible source factors that have been used in order to construct empirical models with the Vietnamese Enterprise Survey (VES) that present clear patterns influencing to the TFP. Additionally, in conclusion, some proposals have been developed in order to use more broad data sates and reflections on incentives that research and development departments could use in the future.

Библиографические ссылки

Altomonte C, Bauer P, G. A. M. S. C. (2022a): “Intangible assets, industry performance and finance during crises,” Universita Bocconi working paper, 32, 2.

(2022b): “Intangible assets, industry performance and finance during crises,” Universita Bocconi working paper, 32, 6–7.

di Marco Pini, Gaetano Fausto Esposito, G. S. (2022): “The age of intangibles: empirical evidences of the effects of intangible assets on firm’s profitability, productivity and on the post COVID-19 recovery,” TESI (Territori Economie Societ`a Istituzioni), 7, 4.

Felix Roth, A. S. . C. R. (2021): “The role of intangibles in firm-level productivity – evidence from Germany,” Industry and Innovation, 30, 281.

GaetanoFaustoEsposito-etal (2024a): “THE EFFECTS OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS ON FIRM’S PROFITABILITY, PRODUCTIVITY AND ON POST-COVID RECOVERY: FIRM LEVEL EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES FROM ITALY,” Unioncamere, 0, 3.

(2024b): “THE EFFECTS OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS ON FIRM’S PROFITABILITY, PRODUCTIVITY AND ON POST-COVID RECOVERY: FIRM LEVEL EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES FROM ITALY,” Unioncamere, 0, 20–21.

Le, M. D., F. Pieri, and E. Zaninotto (2019): “From central planning toward a market economy: the role of ownership and competition in Vietnamese firms’ productivity,” Journal of Comparative Economics, 47, 693–716.

Lilas Demmou, G. F. (2021a): “Mind the financing gap: Enhancing the contribution of intangible assets to productivity,” OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1681, 32, 1–22.

(2021b): “Mind the financing gap: Enhancing the contribution of intangible assets to productivity,” OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1681, 32, 10.

(2021c): “Mind the financing gap: Enhancing the contribution of intangible assets to productivity,” OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1681, 32, 18.

Lilas Demmou-etal, Guido Franco, I. S. (2020a): “Productivity and finance: the intangible assets channel - a firm level analysis,” OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1596, 4, 10–12.

(2020b): “Productivity and finance: the intangible assets channel - a firm level analysis,” OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1596, 4, 14–16.

(2020c): “Productivity and finance: the intangible assets channel - a firm level analysis,” OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1596, 4, 21.

Peter Bauer, A. G. (2022): “INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE AND INVESTMENTS IN INTANGIBLE ASSETS DURING CRISES,” C, 0, 628.

Roth Felix, Sen Ali, R. C. (2021): “Intangible Capital and Firm-Level Productivity – Evidence from Germany,” ECONSTOR(ZBW), 0, 8–9.