MACROECONOMIC IMPACT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS ON UZBEKISTAN’S ECONOMY

Authors

  • Malika Toshpulatova PhD student, Institute of Macroeconomic and Regional Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55439/EIT/vol12_iss2/a37

Keywords:

Uzbekistan, WTO, EAEU, GTAP CGE model, trade integration.

Abstract

This study examines the optimal sequence for Uzbekistan's integration strategies into the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). We explore four main scenarios: joining the WTO without entering the EAEU, becoming an EAEU member without WTO accession, first joining the WTO then the EAEU, and initially entering the EAEU followed by WTO accession. The results suggest that Uzbekistan would benefit most from initially joining the WTO and then the EAEU, as this approach offers greater trade liberalization and generates more significant positive outcomes.

References

Bhagwati, J.N. (1993). Regionalism and Multilateralism: An Overview.” In Jaime De Melo and Arvind Panagariya, eds., New Dimensions in Regional Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bhagwati, J.N. (2002). Free Trade Today. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Brown, D., Deardorff, A., & Stern, R. (2001). Impacts on NAFTA Members of Multilateral and Regional Trading Arrangements and Initiatives and Harmonization of NAFTA’s External Tariffs.

Kehoe, T. J., & Ruhl, K. J. (2008). Are shocks to the terms of trade shocks to productivity? Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(4), 804-819. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2008.04.001

Krishna, P. (1998). Regionalism and Multilateralism: A Political Economy Approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics (108), pp. 227 – 251.

Levich, R.M. (2000). Exchange rates and economic fundamentals. Financial markets and financial crises, pp. 117 – 166.

Li, M., Balistreri, E.J., & Zhang, W. (2020). "The U.S.–China trade war: Tariff data and general equilibrium analysis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).

McLarren, J. (2012). International Trade. Wiley.

Milanovic, B. (2002). True World Income Distribution, 1988 and 1993: First Calculation Based on Household Surveys Alone. The Economic Journal, 112 (476), pp. 51 – 92.

Obstfeld, M. & Rogoff, K.S. (2000). The six major puzzles in international macroeconomics: Is there a common cause? NBER Macroeconomic Annual, Volume 15, pp. 339 – 390.

Reinhart, C.M., & Reinhart, V.R. (2008). Capital Flow Bonanzas: An Encompassing View of the Past and Present. NBER Working paper No. 14321.

Rose, A.K. (2016). Economic integration, economic vulnerability, and state failure. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 25(3), pp. 296 – 315.

Tumbarello, (2005). "Regional Trade Integration and WTO Accession: Which Is the Right Sequencing? An Application to the CIS," IMF Working Papers 2005/094, International Monetary Fund.

Vinokurov, E., Demidenko, M., Pelipas, I., Tochitskaya, I., Shymanovich, G., & Lipin, A. (2015) Measuring the Impact of Non-Tariff Barriers in the Eurasian Economic Union: Results of Enterprise Survey. EDB Centre for Integration Studies Report no. 30, EDB: Saint-Petersburg.

Balistreri, E. J., Tarr, D.G., & Yonezawa, H. (2014). “Reducing trade costs in east Africa: deep regional integration and multilateral action,” Policy Res.

Balisteri, E.J., Olekseyuk, Z., & Tarr, D.G. (2017). “Privatisation and the unusual case of Belarusian accession to the WTO,” The World Economy, vol. 40 (12), pp. 2564 – 2591.

Qonunchilik ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi, 05.06.2023-y., 07/23/181/0328-son)

Downloads

Published

2024-04-29

How to Cite

Toshpulatova , . M. . (2024). MACROECONOMIC IMPACT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS ON UZBEKISTAN’S ECONOMY. Economics and Innovative Technologies, 12(2), 334–339. https://doi.org/10.55439/EIT/vol12_iss2/a37

Issue

Section

Халқаро иқтисодий муносабатлар